CityGov is proud to partner with Datawheel, the creators of Data USA, to provide our community with powerful access to public U.S. government data. Explore Data USA

Skip to main content
The Fluency Gap: When Smart Students Struggle to Read Aloud

The Fluency Gap: When Smart Students Struggle to Read Aloud

During a recent student literacy evaluation, I met a bright fifth-grade student named Mia. Her teachers described her as attentive, articulate, and hardworking. Her standardized test scores in math and writing were right on level, and her decoding skills were age-appropriate. Yet when asked to read aloud during our session, Mia stumbled through the text, her pace halting and robotic. She understood the passage when it was read to her, but her own reading lacked the rhythm and flow needed for comprehension. Cases like Mia’s are becoming more common, prompting many educational diagnosticians to take a closer look at reading fluency as an emerging barrier to academic success.

Reading fluency is defined as the ability to read text accurately, quickly, and with proper expression. It acts as a bridge between decoding words and understanding their meaning within context. Without fluent reading, students expend so much cognitive energy on pronouncing words that little capacity remains for comprehension. Research consistently shows that fluent readers are better able to make meaning from text and retain information, making fluency a critical component of literacy development and broader academic achievement1.

Shifting Instructional Practices and Their Impact

Over the past decade, instructional practices in reading have changed significantly, with less emphasis placed on oral reading in classrooms. In many schools, especially those constrained by tight schedules and high-stakes testing, the focus has shifted toward silent reading, digital platforms, and individualized learning programs. While these tools offer benefits in differentiation and engagement, they often limit the opportunities students have to practice reading aloud in a supportive, corrective environment2.

Technology-based instruction, while efficient in delivering content, rarely includes components that build prosody or expressive reading. Additionally, reading assessments administered digitally may not capture fluency deficits effectively. As a result, students who appear on track in decoding and comprehension tasks may still struggle with fluency, a challenge that becomes more visible during oral reading tasks or classroom discussions. The unintended consequence is a generation of students who can decode but not navigate text fluidly, resulting in lower comprehension and decreased academic confidence3.

Clarifying Misunderstandings Around Dyslexia and Fluency

Many parents and educators, upon noticing these fluency challenges, often question whether the student might have dyslexia. Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurologically based and typically involves difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and poor spelling abilities4. However, students like Mia differ in important ways. Their phonological processing, orthographic memory, and overall cognitive profiles are within the average range. They demonstrate adequate decoding and spelling skills but struggle with the application of those skills in fluent, expressive reading.

These students do not meet the diagnostic criteria for a specific learning disability because there is no identifiable cognitive weakness that explains the fluency issue. Instead, their profile suggests a skill deficit rather than a neurological disorder. That distinction is critical for educators and evaluators to understand. Mislabeling a student can lead to inappropriate interventions, which may not address the root of the problem. What these students need is systematic fluency instruction, not remediation in phonics or decoding, where they already perform adequately5.

Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Fluency

The good news is that fluency can be improved with consistent, intentional practice. Oral reading must be reintroduced as a regular part of daily instruction, not reserved for assessments or special interventions. One effective strategy is repeated reading, where students read the same passage multiple times under the guidance of a teacher or parent. Studies have shown that repeated reading significantly improves speed, accuracy, and expression, especially when paired with immediate feedback6.

Modeling is equally important. When educators or parents read aloud with expression and proper pacing, children internalize these patterns and begin to replicate them. Partner reading, choral reading, and reader's theater are additional techniques that provide structured, supportive opportunities to practice fluency. Importantly, these strategies do not require expensive programs or digital subscriptions. What they require is a shift in instructional priority and a commitment to daily implementation in both classroom and home settings7.

Creating a Supportive Reading Culture at Home and School

Families play a vital role in supporting fluency development. Encouraging families to read aloud together, even with older children, can create rich opportunities for listening to fluent reading and practicing expression. Parents can ask their children to read a page, then reread it themselves to model fluency. Over time, this back-and-forth builds confidence and helps reinforce the rhythm of language. These practices can be integrated into bedtime routines or weekend activities, making reading a shared, enjoyable experience rather than a solitary task.

Schools can support these efforts by providing access to appropriately leveled books and encouraging parents through newsletters, workshops, or brief instructional videos. Teachers can also assign fluency practice as part of homework, asking students to record themselves reading or to practice a passage with a family member. These low-cost, high-impact strategies can help address fluency challenges without relying on formal interventions or special education services that may not be warranted for these students8.

Fluency Instruction as a Renewed Priority

As practitioners in education, we must recognize that fluency is not just a foundational skill for early readers but a critical competency that supports comprehension, critical thinking, and lifelong literacy. The recent rise in fluency difficulties among students with otherwise average academic and cognitive profiles calls for a renewed commitment to oral reading practices. These students do not lack intelligence or motivation - they lack structured opportunities to build fluency through guided, expressive reading.

Let’s not relegate oral reading to the past. Whether in classrooms, libraries, or living rooms, reading aloud must be seen as a modern, evidence-based practice that enhances reading comprehension and builds student confidence. As educators, parents, and public administrators, we have the tools to make meaningful change. It starts with the simple act of reading aloud - every day, with intention, and with joy. Let’s make fluency a shared priority again.

Bibliography

  1. National Institute for Literacy. Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Center for Family Literacy, 2008.

  2. Allington, Richard L. "What Really Matters in Fluency: Research-Based Practices Across the Curriculum." The Reading Teacher 66, no. 4 (2012): 250-260.

  3. Rasinski, Timothy V. "Why Reading Fluency Should Be Hot." The Reading Teacher 65, no. 8 (2012): 516-522.

  4. International Dyslexia Association. “Definition of Dyslexia.” Accessed May 2024. https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/

  5. Wagner, Richard K., and Joseph K. Torgesen. "The Nature of Phonological Processing and Its Causal Role in the Acquisition of Reading Skills." Psychological Bulletin 101, no. 2 (1987): 192-212.

  6. Chard, David J., Scott K. Vaughn, and Jeanne Wanzek. "Improving Fluency for Students with Learning Disabilities: Research-Based Practices and Possible Applications." Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 17, no. 3 (2002): 107-118.

  7. Kuhn, Melanie R., and Steven A. Stahl. "Fluency: A Review of Developmental and Remedial Practices." Journal of Educational Psychology 95, no. 1 (2003): 3-21.

  8. Rasinski, Timothy, and Nancy Padak. From Phonics to Fluency: Effective Teaching of Decoding and Reading Fluency in the Elementary School. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2013.

More from Education

Explore related articles on similar topics