CityGov is proud to partner with Datawheel, the creators of Data USA, to provide our community with powerful access to public U.S. government data. Explore Data USA

Skip to main content
Stop Attending Trainings That Change Nothing: The Case for Action Research

Stop Attending Trainings That Change Nothing: The Case for Action Research

It starts the same way in almost every workplace. A training session wraps up, people nod, maybe even feel inspired, and then nothing really changes.

A week later, the same problems resurface. The same habits return. The same frustrations linger.

What is missing is not effort. It is ownership. That is exactly where action research changes the game.

Action Research: Turning Learning Into Real Change

Action research is not about theory. It is about trying something in real time and seeing what actually works. At its core, it follows a simple cycle. Professionals identify a real problem, test a solution in their own environment, reflect on the results, and adjust accordingly.

Instead of waiting for answers from the top, people become active investigators of their own work. Consider a city manager struggling with low attendance at public meetings. Instead of sending staff to a generic training, the team experiments with different formats, tracks participation, and refines their approach based on what residents respond to. That is action research in motion. It is practical, immediate, and grounded in reality.

Despite its effectiveness, many organizations hesitate to adopt it because it feels complex or slow. In truth, that flexibility is its greatest strength in a workplace that changes faster than static training programs can keep up.

Building a Culture Where Learning Actually Sticks

A learning culture is not built on access to courses. It is built on visible behaviors. When leaders treat learning as optional, employees follow suit. When leaders demonstrate curiosity and reflection, it becomes contagious.

There is a clear difference between organizations that treat training as an annual requirement and those that regularly ask what they learned from a recent experience. Peter Senge’s concept of the learning organization remains relevant because the most resilient teams are the ones that continuously adapt and evolve (Senge 1990).

A small shift in mindset can have a big impact. Instead of asking whether a training worked, organizations should ask what people are doing differently because of it.

Technology: The Tool, Not the Solution

Technology has made learning more accessible than ever. Online platforms, virtual sessions, and analytics tools provide flexibility and reach. However, access alone does not create growth.

The real value of technology comes from how it supports application. Learning platforms can reveal patterns in engagement and highlight where employees struggle. Those insights become powerful when teams use them to test new approaches in real work scenarios.

Research from Josh Bersin shows that organizations that use data to continuously refine learning programs are far more effective than those that treat training as a one-time event (Bersin 2018). Technology should not just deliver content. It should help answer a more important question about what to try next.

One Size Fits None: Why Personalization Matters

Generic training often misses the mark because it addresses problems that are too broad or irrelevant. Personalization changes that by aligning development with individual needs and goals.

When organizations identify specific skill gaps and connect learning to real career aspirations, engagement increases naturally. Two employees in the same department may need entirely different types of development. One may be preparing for leadership responsibilities while another is building technical expertise. Treating them the same reduces impact and wastes time.

Personalized learning pathways allow development to evolve alongside the individual. When learning feels relevant, people are far more likely to apply it.

Leadership Isn’t Taught, It’s Practiced

Leadership development cannot rely solely on instruction. It requires experience. Skills like communication, decision-making, and emotional intelligence are built in real situations where outcomes matter.

Experiential learning opportunities such as leading projects, rotating roles, or shadowing senior leaders provide essential context. Daniel Goleman’s research highlights that emotional intelligence, a core leadership trait, is developed through practice and reflection rather than theory alone (Goleman 1998).

Organizations that want stronger leaders must create opportunities for people to lead before they feel fully ready, while providing the support needed to grow through those experiences.

Feedback: The Engine of Growth

Feedback plays a central role in professional development, but its effectiveness depends on how it is delivered. Vague or delayed feedback rarely leads to improvement. Clear, timely, and actionable feedback helps individuals understand what to adjust and how to move forward.

When feedback is combined with self-reflection, it creates a powerful learning loop. Individuals become more aware of their strengths and areas for growth, which strengthens their ability to adapt. Research on self-regulated behavior shows that this combination significantly enhances learning outcomes (Carver and Scheier 1998).

A simple habit can make a meaningful difference. After completing a task, individuals should reflect on what worked, what did not, and what they will do differently next time.

Preparing for What’s Next

The pace of change in today’s workplace continues to accelerate. Advancements in technology, especially in artificial intelligence and automation, are reshaping roles and expectations. As Klaus Schwab notes, adaptability and continuous learning are essential in navigating this transformation (Schwab 2017).

Organizations that stay ahead focus less on static knowledge and more on building learning agility, digital fluency, and the ability to collaborate across functions. Partnerships with educational institutions and industry experts can also help bring fresh insights into development programs.

Preparing for the future is not about predicting it perfectly. It is about building the capacity to respond effectively when it arrives.

From Employees to Owners of Growth

The most meaningful shift in professional development happens when individuals take ownership of their learning. When employees actively choose what to develop, experiment with new approaches, and reflect on their progress, learning becomes self-sustaining.

Malcolm Knowles emphasized that adults learn best when they are self-directed and engaged in their own growth (Knowles 1975). Organizations play a critical role by creating the environment and providing the resources, but lasting development comes from within the individual.

When people feel empowered to grow, they become more engaged, more innovative, and more invested in their work.

The Moment of Truth

The real question is not whether training was delivered. It is whether anything actually changed.

Learning only matters when it leads to action. Insight only matters when it is applied. Growth only happens when someone decides to do something differently.

So the next time you attend a training, lead a meeting, or face a recurring challenge, do not stop at understanding the idea. Test something. Adjust something. Improve something.

Do not wait for the perfect plan or the perfect moment.

Start where you are, use what you have, and take one deliberate step forward today. That step is where real professional development begins.

References

Bersin, Josh. 2018. “The Disruption of Digital Learning: Ten Things We Have Learned.” Deloitte Insights.

Carver, Charles S., and Michael F. Scheier. 1998. On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge University Press.

Day, David V., and John Antonakis. 2012. The Nature of Leadership. Sage Publications.

Garvin, David A. 1993. “Building a Learning Organization.” Harvard Business Review 71 (4): 78–91.

Goleman, Daniel. 1998. “What Makes a Leader?” Harvard Business Review 76 (6): 93–102.

Goldstein, Irwin L., and J. Kevin Ford. 2002. Training in Organizations. Wadsworth Group.

Kemmis, Stephen, and Robin McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Planner. Deakin University Press.

Knowles, Malcolm S. 1975. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Follett.

Senge, Peter M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday/Currency.

Schwab, Klaus. 2017. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.

Stringer, Ernest T. 2013. Action Research. Sage Publications.

More from Professional Development and Training

Explore related articles on similar topics