CityGov is proud to partner with Datawheel, the creators of Data USA, to provide our community with powerful access to public U.S. government data. Explore Data USA

Skip to main content
Transforming School Culture with Empathy and Trauma-Informed Practices

Transforming School Culture with Empathy and Trauma-Informed Practices

Integrating Trauma-Informed Practices into School Policies

To effectively support students affected by trauma, school districts must embed trauma-informed strategies within policies, procedures, and daily operations. This includes revising discipline policies to avoid punitive responses that can re-traumatize students. For example, replacing zero-tolerance policies with restorative justice practices allows students to reflect on their behavior, make amends, and remain engaged in the learning environment. The U.S. Department of Education encourages districts to adopt trauma-sensitive approaches that emphasize relationships, trust, and equity in discipline and classroom management strategies1.

Implementation begins with leadership. School administrators must prioritize professional development that equips teachers, counselors, and support staff to recognize the signs of trauma and respond appropriately. Training should emphasize the importance of predictable routines, consistent support, and safe environments. Municipal education departments can support this by allocating funding specifically for trauma-informed training and by encouraging interdepartmental partnerships between schools, health departments, and social services. These collaborations are critical in building a network of care around each child2.

Creating Safe and Predictable Learning Environments

Children who have experienced trauma often display heightened sensitivity to changes in routine, authority figures, or perceived threats in their surroundings. Schools can respond by creating environments that are physically and emotionally safe. This includes designing classrooms with predictable routines, clear expectations, and visual cues that help students anticipate transitions. Teachers should be encouraged to use calming strategies such as mindfulness exercises or sensory tools that help students regulate their emotions3.

In addition, safe environments require a commitment to relationship-building. Research shows that students with at least one trusted adult in school are more likely to succeed academically and emotionally, even when experiencing adversity4. Schools should implement advisory periods, mentoring programs, or morning meetings to facilitate authentic connections between educators and students. Municipal leaders can support this by promoting funding models that prioritize smaller class sizes and full-time counselors, both of which enhance the capacity for individualized support.

School-Community Partnerships for Trauma Support

Schools cannot address trauma alone. Municipal governments have a direct role to play in facilitating partnerships between school districts and community-based mental health providers. These partnerships can take the form of school-based health centers, on-site therapists, or crisis response teams. Cities such as Chicago and Los Angeles have successfully embedded mental health professionals in schools through interagency agreements and shared funding models5.

To sustain these efforts, municipalities should convene regular cross-sector meetings that include educators, public health officials, law enforcement, and housing authorities. These meetings allow stakeholders to share data, identify gaps in services, and align strategies for student wellness. For example, if police or child protective services respond to a traumatic incident involving a student, school personnel must be informed immediately so they can provide appropriate support. This requires data-sharing agreements and strong protocols, all of which fall within the purview of municipal education and youth services departments6.

Monitoring and Evaluating Trauma-Informed Approaches

To ensure that trauma-informed practices are effective, school districts must establish systems for monitoring implementation and outcomes. Key performance indicators should include reductions in suspensions, improvements in attendance, and increases in student-reported feelings of safety and belonging. These metrics must be disaggregated by race, income, and disability status to ensure that interventions are equitably serving all students7.

Municipal governments can assist by offering data analysis support and sharing evaluation tools with school districts. Cities with centralized data systems can help track long-term student outcomes across agencies, such as mental health referrals, juvenile justice involvement, or housing instability. These insights allow school leaders to refine practices and demonstrate the value of trauma-informed investments to elected officials and the broader community8.

Professional Development and Workforce Capacity

Building a trauma-informed school culture requires more than occasional training sessions. Municipal education officials should advocate for sustained, embedded professional development that includes coaching, peer learning communities, and ongoing reflection. Topics should include the neurobiology of trauma, de-escalation techniques, and culturally responsive teaching strategies that affirm students’ identities9.

Additionally, workforce development strategies must address staff well-being. Teachers and school staff are often exposed to secondary trauma, which can lead to burnout and attrition. Municipal leaders can support initiatives that provide mental health support for educators, such as employee assistance programs or wellness stipends. Investing in the well-being of school staff not only improves retention but also models the kind of care that trauma-informed cultures seek to provide to students10.

Policy Recommendations for Municipal Leaders

Municipal leaders have several levers to advance trauma-informed education. First, they can incorporate trauma-responsive language and priorities into citywide education plans and funding allocations. Second, they can champion policies that promote stable housing, food security, and neighborhood safety, all of which reduce the likelihood of childhood trauma. These upstream measures are essential complements to in-school interventions11.

Finally, cities can serve as conveners and capacity-builders. By hosting joint trainings, issuing guidance documents, or launching pilot initiatives, municipal governments can help schools integrate trauma-informed principles into their everyday operations. When city and school leaders work in tandem, they can create an ecosystem of support that fosters resilience, equity, and academic success for all students.

Bibliography

  • U.S. Department of Education. 2021. “Supporting Child and Student Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Mental Health Needs.” https://www2.ed.gov/documents/students/supporting-child-student-social-emotional-behavioral-mental-health.pdf.

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). 2014. “SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach.” https://ncsacw.samhsa.gov/userfiles/files/SAMHSA_Trauma.pdf.

  • National Child Traumatic Stress Network. 2017. “Creating, Supporting, and Sustaining Trauma-Informed Schools: A System Framework.” https://www.nctsn.org/resources/creating-supporting-and-sustaining-trauma-informed-schools-system-framework.

  • Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. 2016. “From Best Practices to Breakthrough Impacts.” https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/from-best-practices-to-breakthrough-impacts/.

  • Los Angeles Unified School District. 2022. “School Mental Health Programs.” https://achieve.lausd.net/Page/12124.

  • Chicago Public Schools. 2020. “Office of Student Health and Wellness.” https://www.cps.edu/about/departments/office-of-student-health-and-wellness/.

  • American Institutes for Research. 2021. “Are Trauma-Informed Schools Realistic?” https://www.air.org/resource/report/are-trauma-informed-schools-realistic.

  • Urban Institute. 2018. “Integrating Data to Support Children Experiencing Trauma.” https://www.urban.org/research/publication/integrating-data-support-children-experiencing-trauma.

  • National Education Association. 2020. “Trauma-Informed Teaching and Learning.” https://www.nea.org/resource-library/trauma-informed-teaching-strategies.

  • Center for Great Teachers and Leaders. 2019. “Supporting Teacher Well-Being.” https://gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/Supporting%20Teacher%20Well-Being.pdf.

  • The Annie E. Casey Foundation. 2022. “Preventing Childhood Trauma.” https://www.aecf.org/blog/preventing-childhood-trauma-key-to-healthy-development.

More from 2 Topics

Explore related articles on similar topics