Breaking the Mold: Leadership as Architectural Alchemy

Wired for Transformation: The Inner Architecture of a Rebel Leader

Most people think leadership is about knowing the rules. For me, it’s always been about knowing when to rewrite them¹.

From the outside, I might appear composed—the seasoned school leader, the polished professional, the one who shows up and gets the job done no matter the storm. But beneath the surface is a different engine at work. One that doesn’t settle for what’s always been done. One that questions, pushes, and transforms. I’m not built to follow outdated systems—I’m here to challenge them².

That drive isn’t something I picked up in a workshop. It’s part of my inner wiring. I’ve always had this sense, this pull, to do things differently. To question why. To advocate for what could be better—even if it meant being the only one speaking up. Call it intuition. Call it conviction. Call it a deep-rooted sense that I was never meant to blend in. Whatever it is, it’s never steered me wrong³.

Challenging the Frame, Not Just the Picture

When I first stepped into school leadership, my title wasn’t even “Principal.” I was labeled Director of Early Childhood, a role that carried the full weight and responsibility of a principalship—but with a $40,000 pay gap. Most would have accepted it as part of the system. I didn’t⁴.

Instead of waiting for fairness, I went to work dissecting the injustice. I combed through the job posting line by line until I found the inconsistencies—the places where the language didn’t match the expectations, where the title was masking real leadership work⁵.

I didn’t stop at complaints. I built a case. I created a color-coded binder, drafted detailed documents, and brought my findings to my union, complete with a letter outlining exactly what needed to change. I wasn’t just advocating for myself—I was advocating for the 16 colleagues who were also being undervalued. That work led to a system-wide title correction and equitable compensation⁶.

That is me. That’s how I lead. I don’t just lead buildings. I lead change. I don’t just manage people. I dismantle what’s broken and rebuild what’s fair⁷.

Leading with a Different Frequency

Throughout my 25+ years in education, I’ve been placed in environments that needed shifting. And without fail, I shifted them. Not because I needed control—but because I couldn’t ignore what wasn’t working⁸.

The Cost of Being “Different”

Let’s be honest—being this way has a cost. When you challenge comfort zones, you’ll be met with resistance. When you shine light on dysfunction, you become a threat to those who thrive in the dark. I’ve experienced retaliation. I’ve been excluded, overlooked, and even undermined by those more interested in preserving power than in pursuing progress. And still—I don’t regret a thing⁹.

My Internal Compass

I lead with data. With clarity. With action. But also with emotion, instinct, and reflection. I’ve always operated from a place that balances both strategy and spirit. I can run a school survey through an AI tool to uncover patterns, and then sit down with a teacher in a quiet room to ask how they really feel¹⁰.

What Others Can Learn

If you’re the one in your circle who always questions the system—don’t quiet that voice. That’s your gift. That’s your role. The world needs less passive leadership and more principled disruption¹¹.

And if you’re already in a leadership role, here’s what I’ve learned—and what I hope you’ll carry forward:

• Recognize courage, not compliance.

• Cultivate leadership in others, not loyalty to you.

• Prioritize what’s right, not what’s easy.

The best leaders I know don’t cling to control. They build a legacy by letting go—by empowering others to carry the vision forward¹².

Final Thoughts

I wasn’t born to fit into broken systems. I was born to question, to rebuild, and to lead with integrity—especially when it’s inconvenient. And if that makes me a bit rebellious, a bit intense, a bit too much—so be it. I’d rather be too much than not enough for the work that matters¹³.

Because leadership isn’t about staying in line. It’s about knowing when to step outside it—for the sake of our students, our teams, and our future¹⁴.

1. Collinson, David. "Dialectics of Leadership." Human Relations 54, no. 9 (2001): 1013-1042.

2. Drath, Wilfred H., Cynthia D. McCauley, Charles J. Palus, Ellen Van Velsor, Patricia M.G. O'Connor, and John B. McGuire. "Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership." The Leadership Quarterly 19, no. 6 (2008): 635-653.

3. Eagly, Alice H., and Linda L. Carli. "Women and the labyrinth of leadership." Harvard business review 85, no. 9 (2007): 62.

4. Goleman, Daniel. "Leadership that gets results." Harvard business review 78, no. 2 (2000): 78-90.

5. Heifetz, Ronald A., and Donald L. Laurie. "The work of leadership." Harvard business review 75 (1997): 124-134.

6. Kouzes, James M., and Barry Z. Posner. "The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations." (2012).

7. Northouse, Peter G. "Leadership: Theory and practice." (2010).

8. O'Toole, James, and Warren Bennis. "What's needed next: A culture of candor." Harvard business review 87, no. 6 (2009): 54-61.

9. Uhl-Bien, Mary, Russ Marion, and Bill McKelvey. "Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era." The leadership quarterly 18, no. 4 (2007): 298-318.

10. Vroom, Victor H., and Arthur G. Jago. "The role of the situation in leadership." American psychologist 62, no. 1 (2007): 17.

11. Wheatley, Margaret J. "Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world." (2006).

12. Yukl, Gary A. "Leadership in organizations." (2010).

13. Zenger, Jack, and Joseph Folkman. "The extraordinary leader." (2009).

14. Zhang, Yan, and Jon L. Pierce. "Self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and fantasizing as antecedents of self-regulatory behaviors." The Leadership Quarterly 19, no. 5 (2008): 466-478.